Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/11/2012
State v. Morgan
Citations
- 251 Or. App. 99
- 284 P.3d 496
- 2012 WL 2831117
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 879
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a formal offer of proof was not required to challenge an evidentiary ruling, because the substance of excluded testimony was apparent from the context
- holding that it was error to exclude a treatise on hearsay grounds where the offering party “intended to use the evidence for impeachment, not substantive purposes, in precisely the manner that OEC 706 contemplates”
- an offer of proof shows whether an error \was likely to have affected the result of the case\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- an offer of proof shows whether an error 'was likely to have affected the result of the case' (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “[A]n offer of proof ordinarily is required to pre- serve error when a trial court excludes testimony.”
- “an offer of proof ordinarily is required to preserve error when a trial court excludes testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brewer, Egan, Sercombe, Tempore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-25· cited 14×
- Cedartech, Inc. v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-08· cited 9×
- State v. Salas-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 9×
- State v. LaskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-14· cited 8×
- State v. RevetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-06· cited 8×
- State v. KhoshnawCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-14· cited 6×
- State v. Hites-ClabaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-18· cited 5×
- State v. HazlettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04· cited 5×
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 4×
- State v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-20· cited 4×
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-08· cited 4×
- Dept. of Human Services v. M. T. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-13· cited 4×
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-04· cited 3×
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-30· cited 2×
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-11· cited 2×
- Martineau v. McKenzie-Willamette Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-05-08
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- State v. AffeldOregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 78×
- State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 77×
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court· 1998-12-17· cited 60×
- State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 35×
- Schacher v. DunneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-13· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.