State v. Hazlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although harmless, it was error for trial court to exclude testimony of pharmacologist regarding the “effect of drug-induced dementia on a person’s ability to form intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-12· cited 7×
• State v. Althof
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-26· cited 6×
• State v. Miles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-26· cited 5×
• Brenner v. Nooth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 5×
• Level 3 Communications LLC v. Dept. of Rev.
  Oregon Tax Court· 2018-05-02· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• Sandow v. Weyerhaeuser Company
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-01-15· cited 35×
• Barrett v. Coast Range Plywood
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-04-06· cited 23×
• State v. Harris
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-06-23· cited 18×
• State v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 18×
• Schacher v. Dunne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-13· cited 16×
• State v. HREN
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-06· cited 14×
• State v. Dunning
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-21· cited 10×