Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/19/2009
State v. Morgan
Citations
- 215 P.3d 120
- 230 Or. App. 395
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the officer’s testimony about direct, relevant experience with the suspected crime should be afforded more weight than a general invocation of training and experience
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 332×
- State v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court· 1979-07-31· cited 54×
- State v. Vasquez-VillagomezOregon Supreme Court· 2009-02-26· cited 41×
- State v. VerdineOregon Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 34×
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-09-18· cited 25×
- State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-04-24· cited 15×
- State v. CotaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-25· cited 8×
- State v. WessonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-05-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.