State v. Morgan
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 4966
Syllabus
KNOWING, INTELLIGENT, AND VOLUNTARY PLEAS; PLAIN-ERROR DOCTRINE; COURT-APPOINTED-COUNSEL FEES. The defendant-appellant's guilty pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Because the defendant-appellant failed to raise the issue of allied offenses of similar import in the trial court, we review solely for plain error. The specific facts and circumstances of this case are not exceptional to warrant intervention under the plain-error doctrine. The trial court erred by imposing court-appointed-counsel fees as part of the defendant-appellant's sentence. We vacate that portion of the judgment entry of sentencing imposing court-appointed-counsel fees.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 802×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-14· cited 155×
- Wagner v. Roche LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-12· cited 74×
- State v. BrunsonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-05· cited 45×
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-22· cited 40×
- State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-06· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.