Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/2/1982

State v. Moran

Citations

444 A.2d 879
141 Vt. 10
1982 Vt. LEXIS 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that trial court’s “perfunctory cautionary instruction” that did not specifically address improperly admitted statements did not eliminate prejudice to the defendant
holding that trial court's \perfunctory cautionary instruction\ that did not specifically address improperly admitted statements did not eliminate prejudice to the defendant
court found that “[cjommon sense suggests it is reasonable to conclude” that a robber would conceal the instrumentalities and fruits of a crime at his or her residence
under plain error rule, Court will address manifestly improper argument by prosecution on its own motion because of possible adverse effect on fair administration of justice and rights of defendant
under plain error rule, Court will address manifestly improper argument by prosecution on its own motion because of possible adverse effect on fair administration of justice and rights of defendant
through plain error rule, Court will address a manifestly improper argument by prosecution in closing argument on its own motion because of possible adverse effect on fair administration of justice and rights of defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.