Supreme Court of Vermont· 8/14/1987
State v. Hicks
Citations
- 535 A.2d 776
- 148 Vt. 459
- 1987 Vt. LEXIS 528
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining complainant's delay in reporting abuse through expert testimony that delay is common
- within trial court’s discretion under V.R.E. 702 to admit expert testimony to aid trier of fact
- “The behavioral patterns of child victims of sexual abuse are generally not known to the. average juror and are therefore a proper subject for expert testimony.”
- “The behavioral patterns of child victims of sexual abuse are generally not known to the average juror and are therefore a proper subject for expert testimony.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Hill, Peck, Gibson, Hayes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-12-07· cited 406×
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-02-13· cited 265×
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-14· cited 159×
- Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-06-23· cited 116×
- Az v. ShinsekiFederal Circuit· 2013-09-30· cited 54×
- State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-11-14· cited 52×
- USGen New England, Inc. v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-09-17· cited 45×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-09-08· cited 40×
- State v. GokeySupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-16· cited 39×
- Flanagan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-14· cited 38×
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-11-08· cited 37×
- In re Noel M.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-10-02· cited 36×
- State v. ValleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-12-29· cited 33×
- State v. LyndsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-10-25· cited 28×
- State v. MacRaeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-06-06· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-20· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-28· cited 24×
- State v. WiggSupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-07-29· cited 24×
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-25· cited 24×
- State v. VuleySupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-02-08· cited 19×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-14· cited 108×
- State v. ClaflinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-11-06· cited 80×
- State v. BubarSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-12-06· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-06· cited 59×
- State v. KerrSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-11-01· cited 42×
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-02· cited 40×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1985-07-03· cited 26×
- State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-12-29· cited 17×
- Northern Terminals, Inc. v. Smith Grocery & Variety, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-06-03· cited 16×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-09-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.