Skip to main content

State v. Moore

Citations

  • 56 P.3d 1099
  • 203 Ariz. 515
  • 386 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
  • 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Telephonic testimony thwarts the purposes of the Confrontation Clause in that the jury cannot ‘observe the demeanor, nervousness, expressions, and other body language of the witness.’”
  • “Telephonic testimony seriously impinges on a defendant’s ability to ‘confront and cross-examine his accusers face-to-face’” and with telephonic testimony one cannot “‘observe the demeanor, nervousness, expressions, and other body language of the witness.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Lankford, Irvine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.