Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/12/2002
State v. Moore
Citations
- 56 P.3d 1099
- 203 Ariz. 515
- 386 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
- 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Telephonic testimony thwarts the purposes of the Confrontation Clause in that the jury cannot ‘observe the demeanor, nervousness, expressions, and other body language of the witness.’”
- “Telephonic testimony seriously impinges on a defendant’s ability to ‘confront and cross-examine his accusers face-to-face’” and with telephonic testimony one cannot “‘observe the demeanor, nervousness, expressions, and other body language of the witness.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weisberg, Lankford, Irvine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court· 1987-04-07· cited 253×
- Stephen Christian, A/K/A Stephen Cline v. William RhodeNinth Circuit· 1994-11-22· cited 217×
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-09-05· cited 108×
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-21· cited 70×
- United States v. Christopher HamiltonSeventh Circuit· 1997-03-20· cited 67×
- United States v. Kevin Jacobs, AKA Maurice HawkinsEighth Circuit· 1996-12-06· cited 40×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael MEDJUCK, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-09-03· cited 27×
- Topping v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-06-25· cited 26×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-01-20· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.