Skip to main content

State v. Almanza

Citations

  • 160 P.3d 932
  • 141 N.M. 751
  • 2007 NMCA 073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the [witness’s] busy schedule and the inconvenience that would be caused by either requiring his testimony or postponing the trial until he was able to testify are just the sort of considerations that do not satisfy the exceptions to the [confrontation [cjlause.”
  • holding that “the [witness’s] busy schedule and the inconvenience that would be 11 caused by either requiring his testimony or postponing the trial until he was able to 12 testify are just the sort of considerations that do not satisfy the exceptions to the 13 [c]onfrontation [c]lause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pickard, Sutin, Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.