United States v. Kevin Jacobs, AKA Maurice Hawkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Mere speculation [as to the state’s public policy interest in requiring the defendant to cross-examine a witness by telephone] is insufficient to justify abridgement of defendant’s constitutional right to confront his accuser face-to-face in the jury’s presence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).