Washington Supreme Court· 4/8/1971

State v. Moore

Citations

483 P.2d 630
79 Wash. 2d 51
1971 Wash. LEXIS 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the “Washington constitutional provision against self- incrimination envisions the same guarantee as that provided in the federal constitution. There is no compelling justification for its expansion.”
upholding implied consent statute as a reasonable exercise of the State’s police power, “having as its purpose the reduction of traffic carnage occasioned by the inebriated driver”
upholding implied consent statute as a reasonable exercise of the State's police power, \having as its purpose the reduction of traffic carnage occasioned by the inebriated driver\
upholding implied consent statute as a reasonable exercise of the State's police power, \having as its purpose the reduction of traffic carnage occasioned by the inebriated driver\
no compelling justification to expand state constitutional privilege beyond federal counterpart

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finley, Rosellini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.