State v. Flanagan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \we hold that a criminal contempt conviction does not become moot because a defendant may have served his or her time on that conviction\
• perfunctory journal entry did not specify grounds or set forth any defense offered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Montgomery
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-10-19· cited 198×
• Harsch v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-02-13· cited 93×
• State v. Delacruz
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-03-02· cited 38×
• State v. Dumars
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-04-06· cited 33×
• Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-09· cited 32×
• State v. Jenkins
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-12-12· cited 31×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-10-27· cited 6×
• State v. Lamb
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-01-10· cited 2×
• In re McDaniel
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2017-06-09

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pollard v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 744×
• City of Overland Park v. Barron
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1983-12-02· cited 22×
• State v. Zirkle
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-07-03· cited 22×
• Hendrix v. Consolidated Van Lines, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1954-04-10· cited 22×
• State v. Aleman
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-04-10· cited 18×
• Gambrell v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1945-12-08· cited 14×
• State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Engler
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1957-11-09· cited 12×
• Wallace v. Weber
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1931-12-12· cited 8×
• In Re the Marriage of Marks
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1988-07-29· cited 3×