New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 10/29/1984
State v. Moller
Citations
- 483 A.2d 433
- 196 N.J. Super. 511
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observation of evidence in plain view does not constitute a search
- observation of evidence in plain view does not constitute a search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Dreier and Shebell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GeraldSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-10-25· cited 237×
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-05-20· cited 168×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-03-19· cited 115×
- State v. GibsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-01-21· cited 34×
- State v. AlstonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-01-12· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court· 1927-05-31· cited 477×
- State v. BruzzeseSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-08-08· cited 310×
- United States v. Willard R. SandersEighth Circuit· 1980-09-22· cited 46×
- United States v. Matthew Bellina, Daniel David Hochroth, and Anthony Di BenedettoFourth Circuit· 1981-12-21· cited 41×
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.