Skip to main content

State v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 897 S.W.2d 187
  • 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 786
  • 1995 WL 232701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the defendant neither demonstrated nor argued that missing audiotape contained information relevant to the appellate review of his contentions
  • the defendant neither demonstrated nor argued that missing audiotape contained information relevant to the appellate review of his contentions
  • the defendant neither demonstrated nor argued that missing audiotape contained information relevant to the appellate review of his -13- No. 2--05--0582 contentions
  • defendant’s prior use, possession, sale, or ability to supply drugs on request is evidence of a predisposition to sell drugs sufficient to negate the defense of entrapment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crow, Garrison, Parrish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.