State v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• officers' direction of informant to arrange drug transactions while wearing a transmitting device not outrageous conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Huff v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-06-14· cited 37×
• State v. Shannon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-01-10· cited 15×
• State v. Pollard
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-04-01· cited 15×
• State v. Mitchell
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-04-21· cited 8×
• State v. Bradley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-07-25· cited 5×
• State v. Simmons
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-04-10· cited 4×
• State v. Munoz
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-02· cited 3×
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ALPHONSE D. AVILA
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2023-08-07

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Day v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1989-05-16· cited 537×
• Jacobowitz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 225×
• State v. Hohensee
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-01-24· cited 43×
• State v. Willis
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1983-12-20· cited 36×
• State v. Coffman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-01-11· cited 15×
• Cowans v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-08-29· cited 14×
• State v. King
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-04-22· cited 12×
• State v. Horton
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-09-23· cited 11×
• State v. Jay
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-01-28· cited 7×
• State v. Worstell
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-03-21· cited 5×
• State v. Hauck
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-02-26· cited 1×