Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 9/1/1998

State v. Mitchell

Citations

965 P.2d 149
88 Haw. 216
1998 Haw. App. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the error that “violated [the defendant’s] due process rights” “was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” because “[a]n accused’s right to due process is of overriding importance”
concluding that the error that “violated [the defendant’s] due process rights” “was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” because “[a]n accused’s right to due process is of overriding importance”
noting that “[i]n order to establish a defendant’s culpability for second degree theft, therefore, the State must prove that a defendant intended to steal the statutorily defined value, in this case $300”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Watanabe, Kirimitsu

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.