Hawaii Supreme Court· 10/21/1997

State v. Cullen

Citations

946 P.2d 955
86 Haw. 1
1997 Haw. LEXIS 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

internal quotation marks, citations, and brackets omitted; block quote format changed
internal quotation marks, citations, and brackets omitted; block quote format changed
“Our affirmance of Cullen’s conviction moots the prosecution’s points on cross-appeal. However, this court has long recognized the exception to the mootness doctrine that arises with respect to matters affecting the public interest.” (Citations omitted.)
“Our affirmance of [Appellant’s] conviction moots the prosecution’s [challenge to the sentencing court’s application of HRS § 804-4], However, this court has long recognized the exception to the mootness doctrine that arises with respect to matters affecting the public interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.