· 4/23/1976
State v. Infantolino
Citations
- 355 A.2d 722
- 116 R.I. 303
- 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that law-of-the-case applies to successive motions to suppress
- affirming trial justice’s refusal to instruct jury on voluntary manslaughter because five to fifteen minutes elapsed between alleged passion-producing event and the killing
- rejecting defendant’s heat-of-passion contention, in part, because defendant admitted he was not “mad” and witnesses testified that he did not appear to be upset
- “When a defendant has pleaded self-defense, [the defendant] may introduce evidence of [the] adversary’s reputation for violent behavior in order to show either the reasonableness of the defendant’s fear at being injured or the fact that the adversary was the aggressor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paolino, Joslin, Kelleher, Doris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.