New Mexico Court of Appeals· 8/8/1989
State v. Miranda
Citations
- 779 P.2d 976
- 108 N.M. 789
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the three factors did not apply to entitle defendant to credit because defendant entered into a plea and sentencing agreement regarding all related cases in a single proceeding before a single judge
- stating that the 2 defendant was not entitled to dual credit for days spent in custody on two separate 3 cases which were ordered to be served consecutively by the district court
- “The determinative issue for 15 presentence confinement credit is whether the basis for the confinement was actually 16 related to the charge upon which the final conviction and sentence are based.”
- “The 16 determinative issue for presentence confinement credit is whether the basis for the 17 confinement was actually related to the charge upon which the final conviction and 18 sentence are based.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chavez, Donnelly, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TauiliiliHawaii Supreme Court· 2001-08-09· cited 53×
- State v. SanchezNebraska Court of Appeals· 1994-08-02· cited 43×
- State v. EilolaWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2010-11-23· cited 40×
- State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court· 2002-07-02· cited 31×
- State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-01-08· cited 31×
- State v. WatchmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-22· cited 16×
- State v. WittgensteinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-01-31· cited 16×
- State v. FrenchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2021-07-27· cited 15×
- State v. IrvinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-10-30· cited 10×
- State v. BarriosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-11-02· cited 4×
- State v. RuizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-07-21· cited 4×
- State v. CalvertNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-12-13· cited 3×
- State v. CerdaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2022-07-25· cited 2×
- State v. MoraweNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-09-16
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-06-01
- State v. EakerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2026-05-07
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re AtilesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 79×
- State v. DiazNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-11-29· cited 34×
- Effinger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-01-17· cited 32×
- State v. RamzyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-07-20· cited 30×
- Brock v. SullivanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-02-25· cited 29×
- Nissel v. PearceOregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 28×
- Endell v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-06-26· cited 24×
- People v. JohnsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-12-04· cited 24×
- State v. SalazarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-09-16· cited 23×
- State v. La BadieNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-04-02· cited 21×
- State v. AaronNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-06-11· cited 20×
- State v. HowardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-04-11· cited 14×
- State v. BarefieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-04-24· cited 12×
- State v. PageNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-02-09· cited 11×
- State v. BrewtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-07-30· cited 10×
- State v. OronaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-09-23· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.