State v. Irvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a defendant’s entitlement to presentence credit is based on statutory construction
• “We hold that, under Section 31-20-12 and [State v. ]Orona 7 [98 N.M. 668, 651 P.2d 1312 (Ct. App. 1982

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davis
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2003-05-28· cited 144×
• State v. Wyman
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-04-22· cited 24×
• State v. Wittgenstein
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-01-31· cited 16×
• State v. French
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2021-07-27· cited 15×
• State v. Suazo
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-03-17· cited 6×
• State v. Ruiz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-07-21· cited 4×
• State v. Herrera
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-06-01

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ramzy
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-07-20· cited 30×
• State v. Miranda
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-08-08· cited 27×
• State v. Facteau
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 15×
• State v. Barefield
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-04-24· cited 12×
• State v. Page
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-02-09· cited 11×
• State v. Orona
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-09-23· cited 10×
• Stewart v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-09-30· cited 1×