Washington Supreme Court· 4/7/2005

State v. Mills

Citations

109 P.3d 415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing conviction for felony harassment and remanding for new trial for failure to instruct the jury on all statutory elements
\[ F] acts which are necessary to impose a greater sentence are ` the functional equivalent of an element of a greater offense.\
“[I]t is unquestionably true that ‘threatening to kill’ is an element of felony harassment.”
indicating Hall has been confined since his arrest in 1996
“[F]acts which are necessary to impose a greater sentence are ‘the functional equivalent of an element of a greater offense.’ ” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 609, 122 S. Ct. 2428, 153 L. Ed. 2d 556 (2002))
adequacy of to-convict instructions reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ireland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.