Skip to main content

State v. Miller

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5350

Syllabus

Crim.R. 11; R.C. 2943.032; R.C. 2929.19(B)(3); consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C); advisements. - Judgment affirmed. The record does not reflect that the advisements issued during Miller's colloquy and sentencing were improperly made or prejudicial to Miller. The trial court was not required to make consecutive-sentence findings pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(C) because Miller's consecutive sentences were statutorily required.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.