State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4309
Syllabus
Guilty plea Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) constitutional right burden of proof guilt beyond a reasonable doubt State v. Veney State v. Woods State v. Dangler. This case presents relevant facts identical to those in State v. Veney, 120 Ohio St.3d 176, 2008-Ohio-5200, 897 N.E.2d 621, and State v. Woods, 192 Ohio App.3d 494, 2011-Ohio-727, 949 N.E.2d 574 (8th Dist.). Based on these cases, we find that the trial court's failure to advise Johnson of his constitutional right to require the state to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial renders his plea invalid. Because the trial court judge failed to explain one of the constitutional rights set forth in Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c), no showing of prejudice is required.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 395×
- State v. Miller (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-14· cited 71×
- State v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-02-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.