State v. Burge
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1552
Syllabus
Vacate plea; withdrawal of plea; Crim.R. 11; knowing and voluntary pleas; plea agreement; colloquy; State v. Dangler, 2020-Ohio-2765; consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14; R.C. 2929.11; R.C. 2929.12; purposes of felony sentencing; ineffective assistance of counsel. - Judgment affirmed. Defendant-appellant failed to demonstrate that his plea was entered unknowingly, involuntarily, or unintelligently. The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences. The trial court complied with the principles and purposes of felony sentencing in R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. Defendant-appellant has not demonstrated that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
- State v. StoneOhio Supreme Court· 1975-07-16· cited 134×
- State v. Miller (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-14· cited 71×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-12· cited 32×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2024-03-27· cited 30×
- State v. LevisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-07· cited 8×
- State v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-20· cited 6×
- State v. Dansby-EastOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-06· cited 3×
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.