Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/26/1988
State v. Millard
Citations
- 543 A.2d 700
- 149 Vt. 384
- 1988 Vt. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- State must prove by preponderance of evidence that defendant had failed or refused to abide by one or more of conditions after entering into probation agreement
- “A court may revoke probation only after the State has established an alleged violation by a preponderance of the evidence.”
- examining the record for credible evidence to support revocation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Mahady
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-07-10· cited 28×
- State v. LeggettSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-02-02· cited 16×
- State v. SanbornSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-30· cited 13×
- State v. DuffySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-07· cited 13×
- State v. MasseSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-12-22· cited 11×
- State v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-01-28· cited 4×
- State v. Jonathan C. RichardsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-05-28· cited 3×
- State v. Austin R. BurnettSupreme Court of Vermont· 2022-07-01· cited 2×
- State v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-12-12
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.