Supreme Court of Vermont· 5/3/1985

State v. Allen

Citations

496 A.2d 168
145 Vt. 593
1985 Vt. LEXIS 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant failed to preserve notice argument related to more restrictive alcohol condition and reviewing for plain error
holding that defendant failed to preserve notice argument related to more restrictive alcohol condition and reviewing for plain error
holding that the trial court should be empowered to deal with some conduct immediately, to preserve authority of the court, even if contempt is personally directed at judge
concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing ninety-day sentence for contempt where contemnor had a history of convictions, rather than removing contemnor from courtroom
holding that the trial court should be empowered to deal with some conduct immediately, to preserve authority of the court, even if contempt is personally directed at judge
concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing ninety-day sentence for contempt where contemnor had a history of convictions, rather than removing contemnor from courtroom

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.