Skip to main content

State v. Midkiff

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 4004

Syllabus

The trial court did not err when it did not instruct the jury on the updated \stand your ground\ law, because the change in the law was substantive and thus could not be applied retroactively. Further, the trial court correctly instructed the jury on the law of self-defense. Finally, trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the jury instructions, as the self-defense instructions were accurate. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.