State v. Middleton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court held that, although state did not explicitly express inten- tion to appeal, because state took formal exception to court’s ruling, defendant was on notice of possibility of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bergin
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-04-24· cited 83×
• State v. Glenn
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 17×
• State v. McMillan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-02-09· cited 7×
• State v. Tucker
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-12-11· cited 5×
• State v. Butler
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-09-19· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Leon
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• Gerstein v. Pugh
  Supreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
• State v. Pelletier
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-01-10· cited 67×
• In re Ralph M.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-23· cited 65×
• State v. Ross
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-11· cited 62×
• State v. Avcollie
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-12-20· cited 46×
• State v. Gallagher
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-13· cited 42×
• State v. S & R Sanitation Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-02-17· cited 38×
• State v. Brown
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-06-14· cited 37×
• State v. Hansen
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-06-24· cited 9×