Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/8/2022
State v. Mick
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2378
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed where trial counsel's strategic decisions related to cross examination, jury selection, and calling an expert witness did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel, and retrial in a third trial after a defense request for mistrial did not violate double jeopardy protections, lacking intentional conduct by the prosecution in goading the defense to request a mistrial.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court· 2012-03-21· cited 2,193×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court· 1994-11-30· cited 824×
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court· 2001-06-06· cited 807×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 525×
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court· 2000-12-20· cited 489×
- State v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court· 2009-06-30· cited 302×
- State v. NicholasOhio Supreme Court· 1993-06-16· cited 256×
- State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-27· cited 243×
- State v. ShortOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 187×
- State v. BradenOhio Supreme Court· 2003-04-02· cited 158×
- State v. HoffnerOhio Supreme Court· 2004-07-14· cited 147×
- State v. LawsonOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-12· cited 140×
- State v. RoughtonOhio Court of Appeals· 1999-02-12· cited 15×
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-30· cited 12×
- State v. HeineyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.