State v. Mendoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing this limit in the Allen holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Freeman
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-12-13· cited 7×
• State of Minnesota v. Quintin Lynn Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-07-05· cited 2×
• State v. Mendoza
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-03-25

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Burks v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
• Benton v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
• State v. Golding
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
• Richardson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 873×
• People v. Belton
  California Supreme Court· 1979-02-28· cited 173×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 172×
• State v. Chicano
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-25· cited 162×
• State v. Padua
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 162×
• State v. Watson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-12-19· cited 118×
• State v. Perkins
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-09-28· cited 92×
• State v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-11-24· cited 57×
• Layton v. Committee of Bar Examiners of California State Bar
  Supreme Court· 1974-04-22· cited 54×
• Wood v. City of Bridgeport
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 47×
• Narumanchi v. DeStefano
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-28· cited 44×
• State v. Fuller
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-02-15· cited 42×
• Travis v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 2000-10-02· cited 39×
• Magee v. Marshall
  Supreme Court· 1993-04-19· cited 37×
• State v. Roman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-11-17· cited 33×
• United States v. Bernard John Hinderman
  Tenth Circuit· 1980-07-15· cited 31×
• State v. Smith
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-05-13· cited 31×