United States v. Bernard John Hinderman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• held specious defendant’s argument that he did not incur a tax liability in a given year because the government owed him a refund for withholding
• a judge has “discretion to permit reopening when mere inadvertence or some other compelling circumstance . . . justifies a reopening and no substantial prejudice will occur” [emphasis supplied]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).