Connecticut Appellate Court· 6/28/2005
Narumanchi v. DeStefano
Citations
- 875 A.2d 71
- 89 Conn. App. 807
- 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 263
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellant must furnish adequate record because \[s]peculation and conjecture have no place in appellate review\
- appellant must furnish adequate record because “[speculation and conjecture have no place in appellate review”
- \[s]peculation and conjecture have no place in appellate review\
- “[speculation and conjecture have no place in appellate review”
- “[speculation and conjecture have no place in appellate review”
- \[s]peculation and conjecture have no place in appellate review\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dipentima, McLachlan, Foti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-27· cited 78×
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-19· cited 39×
- Wyszomierski v. SiracusaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-01-27· cited 35×
- State v. ElsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-12-07· cited 26×
- Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-24· cited 24×
- State v. MourningConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-30· cited 17×
- State v. DawesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-07-06· cited 17×
- Reid v. LandsbergerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-08-17· cited 16×
- Lewis v. SlackConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-30· cited 15×
- Sakon v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-11-18· cited 15×
- Ramondetta v. AmentaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-08-15· cited 14×
- State v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-05-25· cited 13×
- DePietro v. Department of Public SafetyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-02-08· cited 13×
- Gevers v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-03-21· cited 13×
- State v. HamlinConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-07-26· cited 11×
- Phillips v. PhillipsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-08· cited 10×
- Williams v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-04-13· cited 9×
- In Re Samantha S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-04-27· cited 7×
- Lopez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-16· cited 7×
- State v. MendozaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-09· cited 6×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-02· cited 356×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-02-10· cited 109×
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-10· cited 83×
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-11-05· cited 75×
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-05-05· cited 72×
- State v. WargoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-12-19· cited 69×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 58×
- Xerox Corp. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-03-18· cited 41×
- State v. HenryConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-01· cited 31×
- Grolier, Inc. v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-03-16· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.