Arizona Supreme Court· 5/1/1969
State v. Mendoza
Citations
- 454 P.2d 140
- 104 Ariz. 395
- 1969 Ariz. LEXIS 289
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There must be substantial evidence which would cause the officers to believe that such evidence would be destroyed if their presence were announced.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland, Udall, Lockwood, Struckmeyer, Cameron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. JimenezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-12-12· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. DeMichelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-04-22· cited 121×
- State v. NordstromArizona Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 119×
- United States v. Phillip MooreEighth Circuit· 1992-02-12· cited 109×
- State v. CookArizona Supreme Court· 1977-04-25· cited 74×
- Griffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-18· cited 64×
- State v. GomezIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 53×
- State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1974-02-01· cited 33×
- Price v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-11-27· cited 32×
- Heaton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1974-08-28· cited 31×
- State v. GassnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-09-21· cited 31×
- State v. RauchIdaho Supreme Court· 1978-10-24· cited 29×
- State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1970-03-24· cited 26×
- State v. BatesArizona Supreme Court· 1978-11-13· cited 21×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-09-01· cited 21×
- State v. DudgeonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-12-15· cited 20×
- State v. EminowiczCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-03-12· cited 20×
- State v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-01-12· cited 18×
- State v. O'DONNALArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-24· cited 17×
- People v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois· 1974-03-21· cited 16×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,525×
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 1,055×
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 701×
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 697×
- Lustig v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 415×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-12-09· cited 384×
- People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-02-28· cited 303×
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Whipple v. MartinsonSupreme Court· 1921-04-11· cited 63×
- La Verl Bailey and Charles R. Smith v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1967-12-01· cited 44×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Richard J. Manduchi v. Jack Tracy, Warden, Lancaster County PrisonThird Circuit· 1965-12-06· cited 35×
- United States v. BlankN.D. Ohio· 1966-03-04· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.