State v. Bates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, absent exigent circumstances, an interval of three to five seconds was insufficient to demonstrate that the officers had been constructively refused
• 3 to 5 seconds insufficient to demonstrate constructive refusal of admittance
• requiring “substantial evidence” of exigent circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Jimenez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-12-12· cited 163×
• State v. Nordstrom
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 119×
• Griffin v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-18· cited 64×
• United States v. Rodriguez
  District of Columbia· 1987-06-18· cited 25×
• State v. Cohen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-04-07· cited 14×
• State v. LaPonsie
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-12-20· cited 13×
• State v. Papineau
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-05-02· cited 11×
• State v. Ortega
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-04-30· cited 8×
• State v. Schmidt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-27· cited 7×
• State v. Matos
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-03-25· cited 7×
• State v. Dixon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-03-11· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Robert McClure Jr., and Donald Gaxiola v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1964-06-19· cited 87×
• State v. Mendoza
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-05-01· cited 43×
• State v. Dudgeon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-12-15· cited 20×
• State v. Brady
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-05-14· cited 14×