Skip to main content
· 4/11/1921

Minnesota Ex Rel. Whipple v. Martinson

Citations

  • 256 U.S. 41
  • 41 S. Ct. 425
  • 65 L. Ed. 819
  • 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1692

Syllabus

<p>1. Minnesota Laws, 1915, c. 260, regulating the administration, sale and possessioh of morphine and other narcotic drugs, held consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment. P. 45.</p> <p>2. The presence in the law of a provision interpreted by the state courts as forbidding physicians to furnish these drugs to drug-addicts otherwise, than through prescriptions does not bring-it into conflict with the federal “Anti-Narcotic” Revenue Act, not containing such restriction, since it does not prevent enforcement of the federal act. P. 45.</p> <p>144 Minnesota, 206, affirmed.</p>

Judges: Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.