Washington Supreme Court· 4/10/2014
State v. Mendes
Citations
- 180 Wash. 2d 188
- 322 P.3d 791
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evaluating when courts must decide if the defense is entitled to a self-defense instruction
- “we interpret these two constitutional provisions consistently”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 303×
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 264×
- State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court· 1986-12-04· cited 257×
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court· 1979-01-05· cited 186×
- State v. UngaWashington Supreme Court· 2008-11-26· cited 86×
- State v. JeaneWashington Supreme Court· 1950-01-13· cited 39×
- State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court· 1973-11-21· cited 26×
- State v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-05-05· cited 18×
- State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court· 1962-06-14· cited 16×
- State v. MendesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-07-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.