Washington Supreme Court· 11/21/1973
State v. Carroll
Citations
- 515 P.2d 1299
- 83 Wash. 2d 109
- 1973 Wash. LEXIS 604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- RCW 10.52.090, forerunner of and identical to CrR 6.14, recognized as creating \transactional immunity\
- because of subpoena, witness was compelled to testify at grand jury proceeding, “requiring the witness under such circumstances to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination would be requiring the performance of a useless act”
- because of subpoena, witness was compelled to testify at grand jury proceeding, \requiring the witness under such circumstances to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination would be requiring the performance of a useless act\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton, Rosellini
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SinitoOhio Supreme Court· 1975-07-09· cited 86×
- State v. FredetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-09-28· cited 64×
- Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 1975-04-24· cited 57×
- Eastham v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-03-02· cited 28×
- State v. MufichSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-03-01· cited 13×
- State v. MendesWashington Supreme Court· 2014-04-10· cited 11×
- In re Dependency of A.M.-S.Washington Supreme Court· 2020-10-22· cited 7×
- State v. RunionsWashington Supreme Court· 1983-07-07· cited 5×
- State v. BarthelmeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-10-25· cited 5×
- In re the Estate of RatcliffCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-01-21· cited 3×
- Murphy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-04-15· cited 2×
- In Re Dependency Of : A.m-s., Dob: 12/17/08, Sergio Michel-garcia, Pet v. State Of Wa, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-12-16· cited 1×
- State v. HarvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-01-25· cited 1×
- Opinion No.Texas Attorney General Reports· 2002-11-20
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 2002-07-02
- State v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-12-22
- State v. EvansMontana Supreme Court· 1978-08-03
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 1,503×
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court· 1892-01-11· cited 1,118×
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1896-03-23· cited 849×
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-03-26· cited 666×
- United States v. MoniaSupreme Court· 1943-02-08· cited 413×
- State v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1955-06-20· cited 33×
- State of Oregon v. HennesseyOregon Supreme Court· 1952-06-18· cited 18×
- Copeland Lumber Co. v. WilkinsWashington Supreme Court· 1969-05-08· cited 15×
- The PEOPLE v. PolkIllinois Supreme Court· 1961-04-26· cited 15×
- State Ex Rel. Adami v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court· 1950-07-25· cited 13×
- United States v. MooreD. Oregon· 1926-11-07· cited 10×
- In re Grand JuryNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1912-03-14· cited 5×
- State v. WhalenWashington Supreme Court· 1919-08-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.