Skip to main content
· 4/29/1982

State v. Melemai

Citations

  • 643 P.2d 541
  • 64 Haw. 479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Miranda warnings were required where probable cause developed at the scene and custody attached
  • holding Miranda warnings were required when “the totality of circumstances created the kind of coercive atmosphere that Miranda warnings were designed to prevent”
  • stating that whether a defendant was in custody or otherwise deprived of his or her freedom of action in any significant way is determined by objectively appraising the totality of the circumstances
  • “custody 5 ’ did not occur until after defendant’s admission of culpability—uttered in response to police officer’s question—gave officer probable cause to arrest
  • Miranda warnings are required when “the totality of circumstances created the kind of coercive atmosphere that Miranda warnings were designed to prevent”
  • probable cause to arrest may play a significant role in the application of the Miranda rule, but it is \not determinative\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Lum, Nakamura, Ogata, Menor, Vacancies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.