· 4/29/1982
State v. Melemai
Citations
- 643 P.2d 541
- 64 Haw. 479
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding Miranda warnings were required where probable cause developed at the scene and custody attached
- holding Miranda warnings were required when “the totality of circumstances created the kind of coercive atmosphere that Miranda warnings were designed to prevent”
- stating that whether a defendant was in custody or otherwise deprived of his or her freedom of action in any significant way is determined by objectively appraising the totality of the circumstances
- “custody 5 ’ did not occur until after defendant’s admission of culpability—uttered in response to police officer’s question—gave officer probable cause to arrest
- Miranda warnings are required when “the totality of circumstances created the kind of coercive atmosphere that Miranda warnings were designed to prevent”
- probable cause to arrest may play a significant role in the application of the Miranda rule, but it is \not determinative\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Lum, Nakamura, Ogata, Menor, Vacancies
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.