State v. Blackshire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overruling Blackshire because it “wrongly decided” that, “as a per se matter, a person is ‘in custody’ the moment he or she has been ‘seized[ ]’ ”
• conversation and general on-the-scene questioning ends and interrogation begins when police request information designed to elicit, or reasonably likely to elicit, incriminating response
• “this request for permission to search came while Blackshire was being subjected to custodial interrogation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).