Washington Supreme Court· 1/19/1989
State v. Mejia
Citations
- 766 P.2d 454
- 111 Wash. 2d 892
- 1989 Wash. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- presence of I1/2 pounds of cocaine combined with informant’s tip and controlled buy supported intent to deliver inference
- presence of 1 ½ pounds of cocaine combined with informant’s tip and controlled buy supported intent to deliver inference
- after police observed drug dealer leave meeting with informant, travel directly to the house in question, travel back to informant, and then only give informant cocaine, it was reasonable to infer that house contained cocaine
- after police observed drug dealer leave meeting with informant, travel directly to the house in question, travel back to informant, and only then give informant cocaine, it was reasonable to infer that house contained cocaine
- presence of one and one-half pounds of cocaine combined with informant’s tip
- presence of one and one-half pounds of cocaine combined with informant’s tip
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-07· cited 345×
- State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 195×
- State v. CreekmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-16· cited 69×
- State v. SolbergWashington Supreme Court· 1993-11-04· cited 64×
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-14· cited 58×
- State v. NegreteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-14· cited 45×
- State v. CalderaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-20· cited 39×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-10-26· cited 33×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. TshudyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-06-24· cited 8×
- State v. HrycenkoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-03-31· cited 7×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-10-13· cited 7×
- State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-12-22· cited 6×
- State v. FordMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-05-16· cited 6×
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-19· cited 2×
- State v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-08-29· cited 2×
- State Of Washington V. Benjamin Jack HooverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-12-22
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court· 1984-09-06· cited 294×
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 272×
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court· 1987-07-09· cited 172×
- State v. OxborrowWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 152×
- State v. PattersonWashington Supreme Court· 1973-11-01· cited 118×
- State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 111×
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-28· cited 81×
- United States v. KunklerNinth Circuit· 1982-06-08· cited 61×
- In Re Dependency of Penelope B.Washington Supreme Court· 1985-11-14· cited 52×
- State v. YaritzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-10-12· cited 37×
- State v. MenaSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-04-14· cited 35×
- State v. HaddCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-09-23· cited 30×
- State v. McManusSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-06-30· cited 20×
- State v. MaffeoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-01-22· cited 16×
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-13· cited 15×
- State v. WitwerCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-04-08· cited 14×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-02-06· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.