State v. Caldera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury must a make a finding of dangerousness under former § 13-604.01
• reasoning that a jury’s dangerousness determination may be made either explicitly by special verdict or implicitly when dangerousness is “a necessary element in the felony for which the appellant was originally convicted.”
• reasoning that a jury’s dangerousness determination may be made either explicitly by special verdict or implicitly when dangerousness is “a necessary element in the felony for which the appellant was originally convicted”
• “whether or not an object [inoperable firearm] is a deadly or dangerous weapon is a jury question”
• both A.R.S. §§ 13-604 and 13-604.01 require that the jury determine the issue of dangerousness
• “whether or not an object [inoperable firearm] is a deadly or dangerous weapon is a jury question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).