Skip to main content

State v. Meeks

Citations

  • 789 So. 2d 982
  • 2001 WL 776488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing defendant need not be convicted of substantive offense in order to lose the benefit of the six-year cap
  • A violation of probation “must always be willful and substantial to produce a revocation.”
  • “a violation must always be willful and substantial to produce a revocation” (emphasis omitted)
  • answering a certified question on the definition of “substantive violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.