Flores v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the six-year prison sentence \cap\ under section 958.14 applies only to sentences resulting from a technical violation of youthful offender supervision, not to a substantive violation (i.e., the commission of a new criminal act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Christian v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-05· cited 29×
• St. Cyr v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-09· cited 18×
• Jacques v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-15· cited 8×
• Flores v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-06-07· cited 1×
• DASHAUN BROOKS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-09-18
• Ramirez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-11

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Meeks
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-12· cited 36×
• Rogers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-09· cited 14×
• Swilley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07· cited 12×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-04· cited 12×
• Boynton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-02· cited 7×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-27· cited 6×
• Morency v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-04· cited 4×
• Willis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-01· cited 3×