Dunbar v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying section 958.14 and holding a defendant placed on probation as a youthful offender cannot be sentenced to more than six years’ imprisonment following a revocation of probation based upon a technical violation
• applying section 958.14 and holding a defendant placed on probation as a youthful offender cannot be sentenced to more than six years’ imprisonment following a revocation of probation based upon a technical violation
• youthful offender's failure to pay the costs of supervision of probation, for not reporting, for not seeking employment, and for not trying to get a GED, determined to be technical violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Meeks
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-12· cited 36×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-12· cited 13×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-04· cited 12×
• Meeks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-13· cited 5×
• Willis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-01· cited 3×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-24· cited 1×
• Wilkey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-15· cited 1×
• Dunsford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-08· cited 1×
• Viera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-30
• Papinchak v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Arnette
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-08-27· cited 27×
• Reeves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-23· cited 7×
• Darden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-03· cited 3×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-28· cited 2×