Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/1/2001
State v. Medrano
Citations
- 23 P.3d 836
- 271 Kan. 504
- 2001 Kan. LEXIS 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The standard for reviewing the decision to authorize prosecution as an adult is whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence.”
- “The standard for reviewing the decision to authorize prosecution as an adult is whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abbott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MaysSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 107×
- State v. KunellisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 70×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-05-31· cited 61×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-06-27· cited 45×
- In re D.D.M.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-03-25· cited 11×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-04-20· cited 5×
- In Re DDMSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-03-25
- State of Arizona v. Victor David RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-06-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.