Court of Appeals of Arizona· 9/29/1992
State v. Mecham
Citations
- 844 P.2d 641
- 173 Ariz. 474
- 122 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 78
- 1992 Ariz. App. LEXIS 275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting a party cannot solely rely “on unsupported contentions that a dispute exists to create a factual issue that would defeat summary judgment”
- awarding market rates and distinguishing Lacer v. Navajo County, 141 Ariz. 392, 687 P.2d 400 (App. 1984), because fees awarded in Lacer were statutorily limited to \amount paid or agreed to be paid\
- “A party cannot rely solely on unsupported contentions that a dispute exists to create a factual issue that would defeat summary judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toci, Grant, Lankford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ulibarri v. GerstenbergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-05-20· cited 89×
- In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court· 1994-06-21· cited 45×
- Carroll v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-05-12· cited 17×
- Delbridge v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-11-08· cited 16×
- Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-11-08· cited 1×
- PNL Credit L.P. v. Southwest Pacific Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-04-28· cited 1×
- Jane Doe I; Jane Doe II; And John Doe v. Lenzner Medical Services Llc... ...Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-05-05
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-06· cited 801×
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-07-28· cited 247×
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court· 1991-04-05· cited 196×
- United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-04-17· cited 82×
- Lacer v. Navajo CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-07-17· cited 49×
- Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-09-28· cited 45×
- Jabczenski v. Southern Pacific Memorial Hospitals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-03-03· cited 37×
- Brecht v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court· 1929-06-19· cited 33×
- Contempo Construction Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-02-26· cited 33×
- Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-08-20· cited 30×
- Brown Wholesale Electric Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-11-12· cited 30×
- Matcha v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-01· cited 29×
- Helena Chemical Co. v. Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-06-05· cited 23×
- Aritex Land Company v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-03-18· cited 18×
- State of Ariz. v. MARICOPA CTY. MEDICAL SOC.D. Arizona· 1984-01-20· cited 17×
- Empire MacHinery Co. v. Litton Business Telephone SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-07-06· cited 14×
- Rio Grande Oil Co. v. PankeyArizona Supreme Court· 1937-11-22· cited 13×
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-05-13· cited 10×
- Gill v. KreutzbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-06-24· cited 10×
- People v. CrosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-04-27· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.