Gill v. Kreutzberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreement held to be valid where it explicitly promised abatement and dismissal of suit where there was no prior underlying duty to abate and dismiss
• forbearance to assert a claim in which a party has a reasonable belief is valid consideration for a contract
• “Forbearance 6 to assert a legal claim is valid consideration for a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Travelers Insurance v. Breese
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-28· cited 25×
• State v. Mecham
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-09-29· cited 12×
• Gomez v. Maricopa County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-08-10· cited 9×
• Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-09-26· cited 2×
• Schachle v. Rayburn
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brand v. Elledge
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-10-27· cited 31×
• Cavanagh v. Kelly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1956-05-22· cited 20×
• Melvin v. Stevens
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-09-16· cited 12×
• McMillon v. Town of Flagstaff
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1917-04-18· cited 12×
• Yarbro v. Neil B. McGinnis Equipment Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-11-09· cited 9×