State v. McNeill
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2659
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's request for an interpreter at her jury trial on one count of theft the record reflects that Appellant's grasp of English, though imperfect, allowed her the ability to understand and communicate sufficiently for purposes of the proceedings. Appellant's theft conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 870×
- Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1907-03-11· cited 97×
- Frank Suarez v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1962-11-14· cited 38×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-19· cited 6×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.