Skip to main content

State v. McNeill

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 2659

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's request for an interpreter at her jury trial on one count of theft the record reflects that Appellant's grasp of English, though imperfect, allowed her the ability to understand and communicate sufficiently for purposes of the proceedings. Appellant's theft conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.