Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/8/2017

State v. King

Citations

2017 Ohio 8910

Syllabus

Anders appeal. The appellant's aggravated menacing conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. In addition, filing a motion to suppress would have been frivolous under the facts of this case. No non-frivolous issues for appellate review. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. McNeill
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-06· cited 4×
State v. Culberson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-22

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
Anders v. California
Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
Penson v. Ohio
Supreme Court· 1988-11-29· cited 13,912×
Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
State v. Mills
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 1,624×
Maryland v. Dyson
Supreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 695×
State v. Hale
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
City of Cleveland Heights v. Lewis
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 110×
State v. Thompson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-01· cited 14×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.