State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• If a defendant’s testimony sufficiently supports an instruction on entrapment, the court must give it, even if the defendant’s testimony is contradicted by other evidence.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McKinney
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-09-28· cited 66×
• State v. Fassler
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-11-28· cited 49×
• State v. Petralia
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-18· cited 19×
• State v. Ostrand
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1974-06-26· cited 16×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-08-14· cited 1×
• State v. Chudy
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-01-05

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Reyes
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-12-08· cited 50×
• State v. Boccelli
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-04-07· cited 48×
• State v. Hernandez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-04-22· cited 40×
• Lutfy v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1952-09-05· cited 28×
• State v. Duplain
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-29· cited 18×
• State v. Rabon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-05-26· cited 12×