Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/7/1999
State v. McHenry
Citations
- 985 P.2d 873
- 161 Or. App. 606
- 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, if the trial court erred when it admitted testimony to which defendant objected only once, the error was harmless because there was “no record of a continuing objection”
- concluding that defendant “had already preserved his [first assignment of error] with his pretrial motion” to exclude expert testimony and did not need to object anew when cross-examining the expert at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Wollheim, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
- Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-06· cited 135×
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 125×
- State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 81×
- State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-02· cited 81×
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-07-05· cited 22×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. CookOregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 21×
- Fugate v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-21· cited 13×
- State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.